AVG – How many Tigers still with us?

This was a sad discovery. in keeping with Soon To Be Gone

How many Tigers still with us?

For fifteen years I have maintained this page as a tribute to the hardiest of the Flying Tigers of the American Volunteer Group. Lately however I have been getting the feeling that it is a death watch, like holding a ticking clock over the last man to say goodbye to all that. So I’m closing it down while we’re still ahead of the game, still have two pilots and five ground crew still with us. I just can’t face the thought of looking at the page with only one name on it. Blue skies to all of them, the quick and the dead! — Dan Ford

http://www.warbirdforum.com/survivor.htm

——————————-Earlier postings by Dan Ford——————————

                         ANNALS OF THE FLYING TIGERS

72 years on …

72 years on When I attended the Ojai reunion of the American Volunteer Group in 1989, there must have been a hundred Tigers in attendance, and most of them were still spry. Time is cruel, though, as A. E. Houseman once pointed out:  “With rue my heart is laden / For golden friends I had / For many a rose-lipt maiden / And many a lightfoot lad.” Sure enough, for the group’s 72nd reunion at Redstone Arsenal  the other week, only three Tigers were in attendance: Chuck Baisden, Frank Losonsky, and Ed Stiles, all ground crew from the 3rd Squadron Hell’s Angels.  (A fourth AVG veteran, P-40 pilot and former flight instructor Carl Brown, is still with us but did not attend.) The rest are gone, as Housman predicted: “By brooks too broad for leaping / The lightfoot boys are laid / The rose-lipt girls are sleeping / In fields where roses fade.” (A Shropshire Lad, 1896)

http://www.warbirdforum.com/avg.htm

AVG Tactics

[The following was written by Erik Shilling and posted on the web. I have made some minor spelling corrections. Bear in mind that Erik himself was never in combat with a Japanese fighter, and only once with Japanese bombers–nor did the AVG ever encounter the A6M Zero in combat. Still, it’s a first-person account from a man who was both a skilled pilot and trained in AVG tactics. Also see Erik’s account of his dogfight with a Brewster Buffalo. — Dan Ford]

by Erik Shilling

When combat was imminent, you immediately went to either METO or Max power if necessary. At times when one’s life was in danger you used as much power as you could get. At METO power the P-40B’s speed would be above 300 mph, and at these speeds, unless the enemy had an altitude advantage, he could not even catch you.

Robert Scott tells the story about escaping from a Japanese fighter. Not being high enough to dive, he says he was pulling 55 [inches manifold pressure] escaping from a Japanese fighter. (41 in hg was T/O M/P) He thought he heard the engine detonating, and reduced power. When the sound he heard turned out to be exploding cannon, he immediately went back to 55 in MP. Needless to say he escaped.

Tactics:

First and formost is a fact often overlook by many, which was the Flying Tigers only attacked IF they had the advantage. (Altitude or speed.)

We used to listen to Tokyo Rose quite frequently. On several of her broadcasts, she called the Flying Tigers cowards because we refused to stay and fight, then challanged us to stop running away. We thought this was quite humorous, and at the same time, knew our tactics were hurting.

Also on some of Tokyo Rose’s broadcasts, the number of AVG aircraft that the Japanese claimed to have shot down, was the exact number Japaese aircraft that we had destroyed. (We only lost 4 pilots in aerial combat.) This was the figure I used in giving our kill ratios. It had no bearing on the number of aircraft we or they destroy. Even [Dan] Ford has said that we killed approximately 400 air crew.

To show a couple examples of attacking enemy fighters: If you attack head on, which the enemy was reluctant to do, because our guns outranged their fighters, they would normally pull up. (If he started turning away, he would already be at a disadvantage.) You started firing at Max range, and then dive away, under these conditions we didn’t turn and tangle with a Jap fighters.

Attacking the enemy from a 3 to 6 o’clock position.

Why roll rate was important, is that one must remember that all maneuvers, except for a loop, started with a roll. The slower the roll rate the longer it took before the turn began.

1. If he turned away, he set you up on his six. A most undesirable position for him, because he would be a dead duck.

2. The enemy invariably turned toward you which was normal and anticipated. With his slower roll rate, you could beat him into the turn, get a deflection shot at him, and when you slowed down to where he started gaining on you in the circle, you rolled and dove away before you were in his sights. If you haven’t tried it don’t knock it.

This is where roll rate came into the picture. As far as Japanese fighters were concerned, their inferior roll rate was at all speeds. Above 240, it would take the Zero 3 second before he attained bank angle for max turn. (And the airplane doesn’t start turning until bank angle is established.)

Since you could see him starting to bank, which you would have anticipated, you could easily bank more quickly and establish max bank angle within 1 second, and pull whatever “Gs” necessary to establish lead.

At this speed, and with your lead already established, you could maintain lead for some time before speed bled off to where the Zero could turn inside, you got the hell out. (Don’t forget same speed and same “G” equal same radius of turn. Above 220 IAS [indicated air speed in miles per hour] the radius of the circle was determined by pilots ability to withstand “Gs” [gravitational forces]. You could turn with the Zero as long as the speed was above 220 IAS.

If his reaction was only to pull

. At these speed the “G” factor still applies; besides, the Zero could not take 6 “Gs,” and the P-40 could pull over 9 “Gs.” Most fighter pilots could “momentarily” withstand 9 “G’s” or more without blacking out.

If the situation was reversed and the Zero was attacking you

. Your roll rate would save your ass by allowing you to roll to max turning bank, using 6 “Gs” or more, then continue rolling to inverted and dive. Rolling 180 degrees to dive would take less than 2 seconds, the Zero took 6. The Zero would never get a shot. He couldn’t get lead, and by the time he was inverted you would already be out of range, gaining speed much more rapidly than the Zero.

As can be seen from the above illustration, that in the beginning roll rate was the primary factor in starting any maneuver except the loop. [And therefore the Immelmann turn, much favored by Japanese pilots.] After bank angle was established then speed was the primary factor. To escape from a Zero, roll rate again became the primary factor, then speed.

Anyone who disagrees with the above has never been in combat, and as far as I know, few books if any bring this out.

http://www.warbirdforum.com/shilling.htm

Roster of the Flying Tigers, 1941-1942

The American Volunteer Group was a unit of the Chinese Air Force, serving in Burma and China from December 1941 until mid-July 1942, when it was replaced by the 23rd Fighter Group, U.S. Army Air Forces.

This roster of the Flying Tigers is complete–really! If you don’t  find a name you expected to see, please look at the  Frequently Asked Questions.  For a list of survivors, see How many Flying Tigers are still with us?.

In addition to the AVG Flying Tigers as traditionally defined, scores of people were involved in supporting the AVG, were attached to it, or joined the follow-on bomber group:

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s