Obtaining the most appropriate material to remember our vets, in place of the usual fare, took more time than I had thought; which is why this is being posted at 0145 hrs on November 12th.
One of the most famous last stands of the Second World War. In the waters off Samar, 13 escort carriers, destroyers and destroyer escorts were the only elements of our fleet in place to defend the Leyte Gulf invasion forces.
October 25 1944:
The US Third Fleet, having fallen for a decoy operation, left the American Invasion beaches of Leyte Gulf all but defenseless, with the exception of a small group of escort carriers, destroyers, and destroyer escorts known as Taffy-3. For the better part of the day, Taffy-3 endured the full power of the Japanese counter-attack. Despite overwhelming odds, managed to stop the Japanese fleet, but at a price.
By the time the guns of the Battle off Samar fell silent five of Taffy 3’s 13 ships: USS Gambier Bay, USS St. Lo, USS Johnston, USS Hoel, and USS Samuel B Roberts had been sent to the bottom, along with 898 sailors, airmen and marines, many of whom would fall victim to shark attacks over the next two days.
When the War Got Personal: The Story of the Men of the USS Hoel
This video doesn’t actually start til 0:26; the essential part begins at 2:08. Made in 2015, these were some of the survivors of the Battle off Samar.
Published on May 21, 2015
In October 2014, twelve First Class Midshipmen of the United States Naval Academy (all History majors) attended the reunion of Taffy III in San Diego to conduct oral histories of those World War II survivors from the Battle off Samar. This documentary reflects part of that work.
USS Johnston Survivor’s Story Part I
Skip to 1:14:30 in this documentary; emphasis being the battle of Leyte Gulf, and the heroic stand by Taffy 3. Only four destroyer escorts, a few destroyers, and the slow, small, escort “jeep” carriers, with no armor, would find themselves taking on a large Japanese force of battleships, cruisers and destroyers.
(Washington, DC) – U.S. Senator Dean Heller sent the following letter to U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary Robert McDonald expressing strong disgust and disagreement with the Secretary’s recent comments comparing the wait times of veterans at VA health care facilities to those of visitors at Disney theme parks.
Full text of letter to Secretary McDonald:
The Honorable Robert McDonald
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
810 Vermont Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20420
Dear Secretary McDonald,
I write to you extremely concerned about the comments you made on May 23, 2016, comparing the length of time veterans wait to receive health care at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to the length of time people wait for rides at Disneyland. Not only am I concerned about the flippant nature of your comparison but also the fact that you said that your agency should not use wait times as a measure of success because Disney does not either. As a member of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, I believe it is my responsibility to follow up with you on the gravity of this issue as it critical to ensure that Veterans across my state are receiving the care they were promised in an expedient manner.
When men and women across our nation committed to serving America and risking their lives to protect us, our country promised that, in return, we would care for these service members upon their return home. This is not a Disney fairytale Mr. Secretary, this is reality. Recent statistics from Nevada show nearly 10,000 VA appointments remain scheduled over 30 days from the requested date. Given the issues that Nevada’s Veterans continue to face accessing VA health care, I do not believe that promise has been kept. Just a few weeks ago, I heard from a Nevada veteran’s wife about the difficulty she faced scheduling a cardiology appointment for her husband. When there are life-threatening issues that can make or break a veterans’ health, waiting is not an option, and Nevada’s veterans deserve better.
Time and time again, I have called for accountability at your agency, and I strongly believe that it should start with the top. This is why your comments were not only disrespectful but harmful to ensuring that there will be any real change at the VA when it comes to the timeliness of health care appointment wait times. When you came before the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee for your confirmation, you promised accountability. Yet two years later, your agency has not only failed to meet the expectations of veterans, Congress, and the American public, but you have now walked back your commitments to those who served. Comparing the health and well-being of veterans to an amusement park is not amusing and is absolutely unacceptable. In issuing your comments, I believe you exhibited a severe lack in judgement drawing into question your ability to provide accountability within your agency, as well as your ability to fulfill the VA’s commitment to Nevada’s veterans. That is why I respectfully request answers to the following questions:
Does the VA remain committed to providing appointments to veterans within 30 days of the request?
What are the current VA appointment wait times for veterans in Nevada and nationwide?
For each fiscal year since implementation of the Choice Act, how many VA health care beneficiaries are obtaining appointments through the Choice Program as a result of an appointment wait time of 30 days or more?
How do you explain to veterans that you believe their wait time for care is just as important as a wait time at an amusement park?
When did your view on appointment wait times change to the point that you believe wait time should not even be a measure for the VA?
Do you believe that the VA cannot achieve both timely and quality care simultaneously?
Do you believe you are still fit to serve and advocate on behalf of veterans as the VA Secretary if you aren’t prioritizing the timeliness of their health care—the very reason you became Secretary in the midst of the 2014 VA health care scandal?
Thank you for attention to this serious matter, and I respectfully request a response to this letter by May 30, 2016.
The gentleman interviewed passed on in 2013. I call your immediate attention to his revealing statement about 35:30 thru 37:31 in the interview.
For this reason, I posted it on Partnering With Eagles under Constitutional Issues, instead of People.
Brits had to give up their guns in 1965 (!); I had no idea that this occurred so long ago.
This statement is a stern warning to us with Government intent on destroying our second amendment.
From Erik Johnston’s YouTube channel:
Published on Sep 10, 2012
To purchase this on dvd, email me at email@example.com
This is an interview with RAF Pilot Rick Brown. Rick flew planes such as the Hurricane, P-51, Sterling Bomber, and the Horsa Glider. He was also an infintry man and explains what it was like to live in London while the Germans were bombing the city.